42
Table 7. Summary of Technical Targets and Barriers for
Reducing Friction and Wear
Challenge
Current
Practice
Technical Target
Barriers
Cost of
validation
testing
Engine tests
costing about
$60,000 each
Inexpensive, predictive
bench-top tests for
cylinder-liner and piston-
ring materials, bearings,
and valve-train
components
Lack of quantitative
understanding of failure
modes.
Lack of understanding of time-
dependent in-situ
contamination and degradation
of lubricants.
Lack of model to predict
performance based on material
properties and design features.
Cost-effective
surface-
modification
technologies
Limit
performance
based on bulk-
material
properties
Coatings or other surface
treatments to allow fuel
injectors, pistons, cylinder
liners, and valve-train
components to tolerate
higher stresses, lower
lubricity, and higher
corrosivity resulting from
new emission-reduction
technologies
High cost of current coatings
and surface-modification
technologies.
Limited wear resistance,
durability, and adhesion.
Lubricant and
additive
chemistry
Trial-and-
error approach
to lubricant
formulation
Develop environmentally
friendly lubricant that is
compatible with new
emission-reduction
technologies
Need model to predict long-
term performance of lubricants
based on properties of base oil
and additives.
Need for sulfur and
phosphorus for high-pressure
applications, but deleterious
effects sulfur and phosphorus
have on catalysts.
Disposal or biodegradability.
Comprehensive
computer codes
Fragmented
codes unable
to handle
lubricated
parts in
relative
motion
General-purpose
friction/wear/lubrication
codes that include splash
and mist lubrication for
designing low-friction,
low-emission lubricated
components and systems
Extremely complex system.
Lack of quantitative
understanding of friction and
wear as a function of basic
material properties and loading
conditions.